Technology Lag
Technology language in 10-K filings, fiscal 1996–2025

Entry of technology vocabularies by industry

First fiscal year in which each of 20 technology vocabularies entered the 10-K disclosure of each of nine industries, fiscal 1996–2025, and the lag of construction behind the earliest entering industry. An industry enters a vocabulary when at least 5% of its operating filers and at least three firms mention it in two consecutive years.

…
median lag of construction behind the leading industry
…
vocabularies that entered other industries but not construction
…
10-K filings, fiscal 1996–2025
…
registrants in nine industries

First sustained entry by technology and industry

Each dot marks the first sustained entry of an industry; construction is shown with the larger dot. A lag marked “≥” is a lower bound, because the leading industry was already above the threshold in fiscal 1996, the first year of the panel. The slider limits the display to the entries up to the selected fiscal year, and the play button advances it year by year. Hovering over a dot shows the industry and the year.

Entry lag of construction by technology

Notes

For the vocabularies first dated after 2005, where the panel is not censored, construction entered 4 to 7 years after the leading industry: cybersecurity 4, IoT 5, cloud computing 6, big data 6 and blockchain 7 years.

For the internet vocabulary, construction was among the industries above the threshold in fiscal 1996.

Seven vocabularies (Six Sigma, RFID, wearables, autonomous equipment, VR/AR, 3D printing and quantum computing) entered at least one other industry but did not enter construction within the panel.

Of the 66 technology-industry entries dated 2006 or later, 11 are risk-first, that is, located mainly in the risk-factor section (Item 1A) in the first years after entry; seven of the 11 concern cybersecurity.

The artificial-intelligence vocabulary is not shown. Its matches before 2015 did not pass the precision audit (initials and outline labels such as “Part A.I”), and it is analyzed with passage-level methods in a companion study.